Re: [PATCH v7] serial: support for 16550A serial ports on LP-8x4x
From: Sergei Ianovich <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-01 17:14:40
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 18:46 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:25 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 13:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 00:26 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
+ len &= 3;Mask as well to be defined.
Sure.
So, but if you support only fixed rates, why do you care about BOTHER at all?
If BOTHER is defined, tty_termios_baud_rate() and tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() allow non-standard baud rates. I should clear it from c_cflag to indicate I don't support it.
quoted
quoted
quoted
I think you can call this unconditionally together with case > 115200.The calls are orthogonal. This one deals with the case when BOTHER is defined and set, and we have non-zero rate with BOTHER, but we have zero rate after BOTHER is cleared. So we set 9600 as a sane default speed.
quoted
This one deals with the case when the rate is over 115200. If the previous case has been triggered, this one won't be.Yeah, but I meant to unconditionally call it just once here every time.
I see. It saves a few lines.
quoted
--- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c: In function 'lp8841_serial_probe': drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c:124:32: warning: excess elements in struct initializer struct uart_8250_port uart = {0}; ^ drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c:124:32: note: (near initialization for 'uart.port.lock.<anonymous>.rlock.raw_lock')Do you have any warning verbosity enabled? I see a lot of stuff like this in the code
Plain `make`. The warning seems to be the result of initializing a spinlock with zero. Spinlocks are intentionally obfuscated, but I didn't investigate further.
$ git grep -n 'struct .* = {0};' | wc -l
338
$ git grep -n 'struct .* = { \?0 \?};' | wc -l
550
( '… = { 0 };' included)The first structure member is most likely not a spinlock in those cases.
quoted
--- Zero triggers a warning. I'll use memset().Either will work.
OK The only remaining open point is BOTHER handling. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html