Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-01-25 08:34:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-spi, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Vinod Koul <hidden>
- 2016-01-25 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
- 2016-01-24 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Måns Rullgård <hidden>
- 2016-01-24 · Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology · Måns Rullgård <hidden>
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:21:50PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:quoted
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> The source and destination masters are reflecting buses or their layers to where the different devices can be connected. The patch changes the master names to reflect which one is related to which independently on the transfer direction.This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the series. What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the dependencies and so on?
Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may consider this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of the driver. -- Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] Intel Finland Oy