Am 15.01.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Pavel Machek [off-list ref]:

On Fri 2016-01-15 10:34:51, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

quoted

Hi Mark,

Am 13.01.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Mark Rutland [off-list ref]:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:28:00PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

quoted

Hi Tomeu,

Am 12.01.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso [off-list ref]:

quoted

On 11 May 2015 at 03:56, NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi all,
here is version 4 of my "UART slave device" patch set, previously
known as "tty slave devices".

Hi Neil,

do you (or someone else) have plans to continue this work in the short
or medium term?

yes, there is something in our upstreaming pipeline. This one works for us on top of 4.4.0:

<http://git.goldelico.com/?p=gta04-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/work/hns/misc/w2sg-tty-slave2-v4>

There is one point still to be solved: the exact style of the DT bindings.

We have an idea how a driver can implement two different styles (child node AND phandle)
so that it is up to the DTS developer to use the one that best fits into the existing DTS.

From my perspective as a binding maintainer, and as I stated before, the
child node approach made the most sense and was most consistent with the

quoted

way we handle other devices.

I simply don't see that this is the most common way other devices
are handled.

You promised to shut up once maintainers speak, that happened, and you
did not shut up. Just do it now.

Nobody has asked for your unqualified and not helpful comments.

So please shut up yourself and stop to disturb Free Software projects.