Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular
From: Alexandre Belloni <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-21 08:38:22
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-mediatek, linuxppc-dev, lkml
On 20/10/2015 at 20:20:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote :
[Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular] On 20/10/2015 (Tue 17:10) Alexandre Belloni wrote:quoted
On 18/10/2015 at 18:21:13 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote :quoted
The one common thread here for all the patches is that we also scrap the .remove functions which would only be used for module unload (impossible) and driver unbind. For the drivers here, there doesn't seem to be a sensible unbind use case (vs. e.g. a multiport PCI ethernet driver where one port is unbound and passed through to a kvm guest or similar). Hence we just explicitly disallow any driver unbind operations to help prevent root from doing something illogical to the machine that they could have done previously. We've already done this for drivers/tty/serial/mpsc.c previously. Build tested for allmodconfig on ARM64 and powerpc for tty/tty-testing.So, how does this actually build test atmel_serial?Not sure why this should be a surprise; I build test it exactly like this:
CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL is not selected by allmodconfig on arm64 or powerpc so this is not explaining how you build tested atmel_serial.
paul@builder-02:~/git/linux-head$ echo $ARCH arm64 paul@builder-02:~/git/linux-head$ echo $CROSS_COMPILE aarch64-linux-gnu- paul@builder-02:~/git/linux-head$ make O=../arm-build/ drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.o make[1]: Entering directory '/home/paul/git/arm-build' arch/arm64/Makefile:25: LSE atomics not supported by binutils CHK include/config/kernel.release Using /home/paul/git/linux-head as source for kernel GEN ./Makefile CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h [...] HOSTCC scripts/sign-file HOSTCC scripts/extract-cert CC drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.o make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/paul/git/arm-build' paul@builder-02:~/git/linux-head$ It did build; no warning/error. Would you call it an invalid build test?
What you describe is a different test. I end up with 4 warnings when doing that on my machine. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com