Thread (68 messages) 68 messages, 7 authors, 2014-09-23

Re: [PATCH 13/26] locking: Add non-fatal spin lock assert

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2014-09-03 14:40:53
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:20:04AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Peter,

On 09/03/2014 05:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:39:22PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
quoted
Provide method for non-essential or non-critical code to warn of
invariant errors.

CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <redacted>
---
 include/linux/spinlock.h         | 1 +
 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 1 +
 include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h  | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867f..8a9aaf1 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static inline int spin_can_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 }
 
 #define assert_spin_locked(lock)	assert_raw_spin_locked(&(lock)->rlock)
+#define warn_not_spin_locked(lock)	warn_not_raw_spin_locked(&(lock)->rlock)
 
 /*
  * Pull the atomic_t declaration:
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
index 42dfab8..0ddd499 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 int in_lock_functions(unsigned long addr);
 
 #define assert_raw_spin_locked(x)	BUG_ON(!raw_spin_is_locked(x))
+#define warn_not_raw_spin_locked(x)	WARN_ON_ONCE(!raw_spin_is_locked(x))
No we should remove assert_spin_locked() not add to it. Use
lockdep_assert_held() instead.
I probably should have been more descriptive in the changelog: this
is not for a test configuration, but rather, an assertion in an
exported api.
So ?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help