On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:43:11AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:

On 09/17/2012 06:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

Here comes the lucky v7:

- Per Alan Cox's suggestion added hangup method and removed a small
  leftover;
- Per Colin Cross' suggestion moved IRQ quiescing logic into
  poll_get_char routine. IIUC, Alan is less unhappy about it.  As a
  result, clear_irq() callback dropped.

These patches can be found in the following repo (based on tty-next):

	git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/linux-nmi-kdb.git master

Old changelogs and rationale for these patches can be found here:

	v1-v5, rationale: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2
	v6: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2

I have no objection to these patches, and as they are based on my
tty-next tree, should I be the ones accepting them?  If so, then I need
a bunch of acks from others involved in the kdb/kgdb code before I can
do so.

To make it easier, can I just take the tty driver patches now?  Will
that break anything?

I have not made my way through the entire series yet, so I am not sure
if you need the kdb header changes or not, but so far it looks like
the tty pieces are separate.  If you add your ack Greg, I'll take the
whole series and merge it into kgdb-next, or after I finish the review
we could do it the other way around.

Your tree is fine:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Let me know if you have problems merging this due to any tty patches,
and if so, I'll be glad to take them through my tree.

greg k-h