Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring... | linux-serial

[PATCH v2 0/3] tty: serial: OMAP: work around broken IP block, driver · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-01-26
[PATCH v2 1/3] tty: serial: OMAP: use a 1-byte RX FIFO threshold in PIO mode · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-01-26
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-01-26
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-01-26
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · Govindraj <hidden> · 2012-01-27
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-20
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-02-21
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-24
[PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-02-28
[PATCH] tty: serial: OMAP: Fix oops due to NULL pdata in DT boot · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-28
[PATCH] tty: serial: OMAP: Fix oops due to NULL pdata in DT boot · gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH) · 2012-02-28
[PATCH v2 3/3] tty: serial: omap-serial: wakeup latency constraint is in microseconds, not milliseconds · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-01-26
[PATCH v2 3/3] tty: serial: omap-serial: wakeup latency constraint is in microseconds, not milliseconds · Govindraj <hidden> · 2012-01-27

STALE5217d REVIEWED: 4 (4M)

Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode

From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Date: 2012-02-28 17:13:43
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap

Hi

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:

On 2/21/2012 11:02 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:

quoted

Looks fine to me, although I'd suggest fixing the DMA workaround path as
well.

Mmm, I've tried to fix every instances of pdata in the code, you think I
missed some?

I'll check again.

quoted

Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>

I just doublechecked the code paths and looks like you covered them all.  
Sorry about the confusion.

Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>

- Paul

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help