Hi Vinod

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:59 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

quoted

Hi Vinod

Thanks for your reply.

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:34 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

[snip]

quoted

quoted

quoted

How would you like to do this? Don't you think, it would be good to allow 
both: either implement a dmaengine driver directly, exactly as all drivers 
are doing now, or use the additional helper library for suitable (simple) 
hardware types? I see it similar to I2C, where you either implement an I2C 
driver directly, or you use the bitbanging abstraction for simpler 
hardware.

I think it would be good to have both, this can be used by folks who
don't have sg support available.

Ok, so, should I just rename the driver to sgsoft? Is this the only 
change, that you'd like to see?

That would be one :)
Also, I would review the other patch patches by today/tomorrow, you can
add any changes in next version as well

Do I understand it right, that I'm waiting for your review before 
submitting the next version?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/