Re: [PATCH] serial: SERIAL_MRST_MAX3110 should depend on X86_MRST
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-17 11:29:22
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-17 11:29:22
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:40:16 +0200 Jean Delvare [off-list ref] wrote:
As I understand it, driver mrst_max3110 is only useful on Moorestown systems, so it should depend on X86_MRST.
Not so simple. There are various things that need dependancies. Some I've sorted in my tree, some not, but it's all shelved until kernel.org is back as I've switched to working on other projects for the moment rather than waste time chasing trees around the internet.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <redacted> Cc: Alan Cox <redacted> --- There are a few other drivers in a similar situation (i2c/busses/i2c-intel-mid, gpio/langwell_gpio, tty/serial/mfd, staging/sep) for which I suspect the same should be done, assuming that X86_MRST is for both Moorestown and Medfield.
Not with the latest patches. Alan