Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2011-09-27

Re: [PATCH] serial: SERIAL_MRST_MAX3110 should depend on X86_MRST

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-17 11:29:22

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:40:16 +0200
Jean Delvare [off-list ref] wrote:
As I understand it, driver mrst_max3110 is only useful on Moorestown
systems, so it should depend on X86_MRST.
Not so simple. There are various things that need dependancies. Some I've
sorted in my tree, some not, but it's all shelved until kernel.org is
back as I've switched to working on other projects for the moment rather
than waste time chasing trees around the internet.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <redacted>
Cc: Alan Cox <redacted>
---
There are a few other drivers in a similar situation
(i2c/busses/i2c-intel-mid, gpio/langwell_gpio, tty/serial/mfd,
staging/sep) for which I suspect the same should be done,
assuming that X86_MRST is for both Moorestown and Medfield.
Not with the latest patches.

Alan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help