Re: [RFC 1/5] platform-drivers-x86: add support for Technologic Systems TS-5xxx detection
From: Vivien Didelot <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-02 21:07:34
Also in:
lkml, platform-driver-x86
Hi, Thanks you all for your comments, I'll consider them carefully. Excerpts from Greg KH's message of 2011-04-29 19:32:30 -0400:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:21:48PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:quoted
+/proc filesystem +---------------- + +Information about the TS board is available through the /proc/ts-sbcinfo.Really? Why? As you now have added a new kernel/user ABI, it must be documented in Documentation/ABI/ Please include that in your next patch. But first off, why a new proc file? What is it used for?
I think it could be useful for the user to know what option is available or not on the board.
quoted
+static int ts_sbcinfo_init_buffer(char *buf, struct ts5xxx_sbcinfo *sbcinfo) +{ + char *pos = buf; + + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "Board ID", "TS-%d", sbcinfo->board_id); + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "RS485", "%s", sbcinfo->rs485 ? "yes" : "no"); + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "AnalogToDigital", "%s", + sbcinfo->adc ? "yes" : "no"); + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "Auto485", "%s", sbcinfo->auto485 ? "yes" : "no"); + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "SRAM", "%s", sbcinfo->sram ? "yes" : "no"); + pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "External Reset", "%s", + sbcinfo->external_reset ? "yes" : "no");Most of these look like they should be simple "one value per file" sysfs files for your system. That would make things much easier on your userspace tools to handle parsing them properly, right? Why not do that instead?
I had a look at other drivers, and /sys/devices/platform/ts/ seems to be a good place to hold those entries (one per options as you suggested). Do you agree with that? By the way, as they would be sysfs attributes, is Documentation/ABI the best place to add the documentation file?
thanks, greg k-h
Regards, Vivien.