Re: [smatch stuff] altera_uart: inconsistent checks for null
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-19 14:07:43
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:22:17PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
Hi Dan, On 2011-02-19 at 10:31:07 +0100, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Patch 2780ad42f5fe67 "tty: serial: altera_uart: Use port->regshift to store bus shift" added a NULL check for platp in altera_uart_probe() but not consistently through out the function. drivers/tty/serial/altera_uart.c +553 altera_uart_probe(43) error: we previously assumed 'platp' could be null. 545 if (platp) ^^^^^^^ checked here. 546 port->regshift = platp->bus_shift; 547 else 548 port->regshift = 0; 549 550 port->line = i; 551 port->type = PORT_ALTERA_UART; 552 port->iotype = SERIAL_IO_MEM; 553 port->uartclk = platp->uartclk; ^^^^^^^ potential NULL dereference?Not at the moment, because everybody is using platform data at the momenti, so platp should never be NULL. Still this is inconsistent and shouldn't be there like this. The dereference on line 553 will go away with the patch introducing device tree support to altera_uart [1]. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/18/100quoted
554 port->ops = &altera_uart_ops; I don't know the right way to address this.I guess either Greg or Grant will take the above mentioned patch (it depends on a commit in Grant's tree).
Sounds good. regards, dan carpenter