Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2010-08-31

Re: serial.h v serial_core.h PORT_ defines?

From: Philippe Langlais <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-31 11:57:02

Hi,
You are right.
I'll add my define in serial_core.h (#19), and withdraw U6_16550A 
definition in serial.h.
I'll post a patch to fix it.
I have the same question about these double definitions.

Thanks

Philippe

On 08/27/10 21:35, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
   I was playing with sparse and it flagged that in drivers/serial/8250.c
there is a duplicate initialiser in the uart_config[] array
(from Linus's git):

        [PORT_NS16550A] = {
                 .name           = "NS16550A",
                 .fifo_size      = 16,
                 .tx_loadsz      = 16,
                 .fcr            = UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10,
                 .flags          = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_NATSEMI,
         },

and
        [PORT_U6_16550A] = {
                 .name           = "U6_16550A",
                 .fifo_size      = 64,
                 .tx_loadsz      = 64,
                 .fcr            = UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10,
                 .flags          = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_CAP_AFE,
         },

now PORT_NS16550A is defined as 14 in serial_core.h:

#define PORT_NS16550A   14

and PORT_U6_16550A is defined as 14 in serial.h:

235dae5d (Philippe Langlais 2010-07-29 17:13:57 +0200  80) #define PORT_U6_16550A       14

I guess that might subtly break NS16550A users?

My assumption is that Philippe's addition should actually
be to the serial_core.h list which currently goes upto 18.

However, that leaves the question of why is there a set of nearly
but not quite idential defines in serial.h and serial_core.h?

(please leave me on cc for replies)

Dave
   
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help