On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

From: Alan Cox <redacted>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100

quoted

Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated their
platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining
and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the
programme (its been 6 months).

I took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way
you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly
for what you're trying to do.

I don't see a real problem. You aren't using

	c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000

so that could become BOTHER.

the input bits also appear to be reserved and free ?