Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2d ago

Re: [PATCH] dm-verity: clear LSM integrity state on suspend

flat view

From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Date: 2026-09-21 22:16:27

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] dm-verity: clearing LSM state on suspend breaks IPE for cached files
- [High] ipe: Use-After-Free in evaluate_dmv_roothash() due to missing RCU
--

commit 0a1a0f42158da1707e32f8b9739a8420e73985d1
Author: Fan Wu [off-list ref]

dm-verity: clear LSM integrity state on suspend

This commit updates dm-verity to clear the published root hash and signature
state from the LSM security blob during verity_postsuspend(). This prevents
the block device from retaining stale attributes if the verity target is
replaced with a different target type.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
index cb105ccc47ecb..6d589867623c0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1779,8 +1781,31 @@ static int verity_preresume(struct dm_target *ti)
 	return r;
 }
 
+static void verity_security_clear_integrity(struct dm_target *ti)
+{
+	struct block_device *bdev = dm_disk(dm_table_get_md(ti->table))->part0;
+
+	security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, NULL, 0);
[Severity: High]
Does passing NULL to security_bdev_setintegrity() trigger a use-after-free
in IPE?

When this is called, ipe_bdev_setintegrity() appears to free the root hash
without RCU synchronization:

security/ipe/hooks.c:ipe_bdev_setintegrity() {
	if (!value) {
		ipe_digest_free(blob->root_hash);
		blob->root_hash = NULL;
...

If a concurrent thread is evaluating an mprotect or execve call, could it
dereference this freed memory in evaluate_dmv_roothash()?

security/ipe/eval.c:evaluate_dmv_roothash() {
	...
	ipe_digest_eval(p->value, ctx->ipe_bdev->root_hash);
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	verity_security_clear_signature(bdev);
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline void verity_security_clear_integrity(struct dm_target *ti)
+{
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 
+static void verity_postsuspend(struct dm_target *ti)
+{
+	struct dm_verity *v = ti->private;
+
+	flush_workqueue(v->verify_wq);
+	dm_bufio_client_reset(v->bufio);
+	verity_security_clear_integrity(ti);
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally clearing the integrity state on every table suspend break
IPE evaluation for already cached files?

During a temporary freeze or table reload, clearing the LSM integrity state
will cause concurrent VFS operations on already-cached files to see a cleared
state. Will this result in spurious -EACCES failures since IPE will deny
access despite the files being valid?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+}
+
 static struct target_type verity_target = {
 	.name		= "verity",
 /* Note: the LSMs depend on the singleton and immutable features */
-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921220516.121589-1-wufan@kernel.org?part=1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help