[...]

Blaise started this most recent effort by attempting to address the
concerns brought up in previous efforts, you and others rejected this
first attempt and directed Blaise towards a light skeleton and LSM
based approach, which is where he is at with Hornet.  Once again, you
reject this approach with minimal guidance on what would be
acceptable, and our response is to ask for clarification on your
preferred design.  We're not asking for a full working solution,
simply a couple of paragraphs outlining the design with enough detail
to put forward a working solution that isn't immediately NACK'd.
We've made this request multiple times in the past, most recently this
past weekend, where KP replied that he would be "happy" to share

Here's the proposed design:

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACYkzJ6VQUExfyt0=-FmXz46GHJh3d=FXh5j4KfexcEFbHV-vg@mail.gmail.com/#t (local)

designs/code.  Unfortunately, since then all we've received from
either you or KP since then has been effectively just a list of your
objections on repeat; surely typing out a couple of paragraphs
outlining a design would have been quicker, easier, and more
constructive then your latest reply?