Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 6 authors, 2025-03-06
STALE452d

[PATCH v2 5/6] lockdown: Make the relationship to MODULE_SIG a dependency

From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Date: 2025-01-20 17:45:41
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-kbuild, linux-modules, lkml
Subsystem: lockdown security module, security subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Nicolas Bouchinet, Xiu Jianfeng, Paul Moore, James Morris, "Serge E. Hallyn", Linus Torvalds

The new hash-based module integrity checking will also be able to
satisfy the requirements of lockdown.
Such an alternative is not representable with "select", so use
"depends on" instead.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
 security/lockdown/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/lockdown/Kconfig b/security/lockdown/Kconfig
index e84ddf48401010bcc0829a32db58e6f12bfdedcb..155959205b8eac2c85897a8c4c8b7ec471156706 100644
--- a/security/lockdown/Kconfig
+++ b/security/lockdown/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 config SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM
 	bool "Basic module for enforcing kernel lockdown"
 	depends on SECURITY
-	select MODULE_SIG if MODULES
+	depends on !MODULES || MODULE_SIG
 	help
 	  Build support for an LSM that enforces a coarse kernel lockdown
 	  behaviour.
-- 
2.48.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help