On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:45 AM Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 06:17:43AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 17:30 +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:39:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:52:42PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
...
quoted
A better solution here would be to make inode->i_ino a u64, and just
fix up all of the places that touch it to expect that. Then, just
I would like us to try and see to make this happen. I really dislike
that struct inode is full of non-explicity types.
Presumably this would include moving all of the filesystems to use
inode->i_ino instead of their own private file ID number, e.g. the NFS
issue pointed out in the original patch? If not, I think most of us
in the LSM/audit space still have a need for a filesystem agnostic way
to determine the inode number from an inode struct.
--
paul-moore.com