Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] landlock: Fix non-TCP sockets restriction
From: Mikhail Ivanov <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-03 21:30:13
Also in:
netdev, netfilter-devel
On 10/3/2024 8:45 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
Please also add Matthieu in Cc for the network patch series. On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:39:31PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:quoted
Do not check TCP access right if socket protocol is not IPPROTO_TCP. LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP should not restrict bind(2) and connect(2) for non-TCP protocols (SCTP, MPTCP, SMC). Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/40 Fixes: fff69fb03dde ("landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect") Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <redacted> --- security/landlock/net.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c index bc3d943a7118..6f59dd98bb13 100644 --- a/security/landlock/net.c +++ b/security/landlock/net.c@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock, return -EACCES; /* Checks if it's a (potential) TCP socket. */We can extend this comment to explain that we don't use sk_is_tcp() because we need to handle the AF_UNSPEC case.
Indeed, I'll do this.
quoted
- if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM) + if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM || sock->sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)I think we should check sock->sk->sk_type instead of sock->type (even if it should be the same). To make it simpler, we should only use sk in current_check_access_socket(): struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
Agreed.
Could you please also do s/__sk_common\.skc_/sk_/g ?
Ofc Btw, there is probably incorrect read of skc_family in this function [1]. I'll add READ_ONCE for sk->sk_family. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240202095404.183274-1-edumazet@google.com/ (local)
quoted
return 0; /* Checks for minimal header length to safely read sa_family. */ -- 2.34.1