Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: Do jump_label_init before early_security_init
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2024-08-01 01:15:15
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:34 PM KP Singh [off-list ref] wrote:
LSM indirect calls being are now replaced by static calls, this requires
a jumpt_table_init before early_security_init where LSM hooks and their
static calls and keys are initialized.
Fixes: 2732ad5ecd5b ("lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
---
init/main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Does this look okay, static call folks?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c index 206acdde51f5..5bd45af7a49e 100644 --- a/init/main.c +++ b/init/main.c@@ -922,6 +922,8 @@ void start_kernel(void) boot_cpu_init(); page_address_init(); pr_notice("%s", linux_banner); + /* LSM and command line parameters use static keys */ + jump_label_init(); early_security_init(); setup_arch(&command_line); setup_boot_config();@@ -933,8 +935,6 @@ void start_kernel(void) boot_cpu_hotplug_init(); pr_notice("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line); - /* parameters may set static keys */ - jump_label_init(); parse_early_param(); after_dashes = parse_args("Booting kernel", static_command_line, __start___param, --2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog
-- paul-moore.com