On Aug 25, 2024 Tetsuo Handa [off-list ref] wrote:

Because these are equals to MAX_LSM_COUNT. Also, we can avoid dynamic
memory allocation for ordered_lsms because MAX_LSM_COUNT is a constant.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
 security/security.c | 37 ++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Looks reasonable to me, merged into lsm/dev, thanks.

--
paul-moore.com