Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, 2024-07-01

Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2024-06-06 16:36:13
Also in: bpf

On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:35:19AM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
quoted
This series is a respin of the RFC proposed by Paul Renauld (renauld@google.com)
and Brendan Jackman (jackmanb@google.com) [1]

# Performance improvement

With this patch-set some syscalls with lots of LSM hooks in their path
benefitted at an average of ~3% and I/O and Pipe based system calls benefitting
the most.
Hi Paul,

With the merge window closed now, can we please land this in -next so we
can get any glitches found/hammered out with maximal time before the
next merge window?
It's in the queue, I've been swamped lately as you'll likely notice I
haven't really had a chance to process patches yet during this cycle.

We've also been over this soo many times that I've lost count - you
know this is on my list, I've mentioned it multiple times that this is
now high on the todo list, and your continued nagging does nothing
other than make me want to look at other patches first.  You're not
helping your cause Kees.

-- 
paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help