Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] ima: Record i_version of real_inode for change detection
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2024-02-13 23:14:31
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-unionfs, lkml
On 2/6/24 10:54, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 17:23 +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:25 PM Stefan Berger [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
process_measurement() will try to detect file content changes for not-yet- copied-up files on a stacked filesystem based on the i_version number of the real inode: !inode_eq_iversion(real_inode, iint->version) Therefore, take a snapshot of the i_version of the real file to be used for i_version number-based file content change detection by IMA in process_meassurements(). In this case vfs_getattr_nosec() cannot be used since it will return the i_version number of the file on the overlay layer which will trigger more iint resets in process_measurements() than necessary since this i_version number represents different state than that of the real_inode (of a not-yet-copied up file). Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 597ea0c4d72f..530888cc481e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/xattr.h> #include <linux/evm.h> #include <linux/fsverity.h> +#include <linux/iversion.h> #include "ima.h"@@ -250,7 +251,6 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, int result = 0; int length; void *tmpbuf; - u64 i_version = 0; /* * Always collect the modsig, because IMA might have already collected@@ -263,16 +263,6 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, if (iint->flags & IMA_COLLECTED) goto out; - /* - * Detecting file change is based on i_version. On filesystems - * which do not support i_version, support was originally limited - * to an initial measurement/appraisal/audit, but was modified to - * assume the file changed. - */ - result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE, - AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT); - if (!result && (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE)) - i_version = stat.change_cookie; hash.hdr.algo = algo; hash.hdr.length = hash_digest_size[algo];@@ -302,10 +292,22 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, iint->ima_hash = tmpbuf; memcpy(iint->ima_hash, &hash, length); - iint->version = i_version; - if (real_inode != inode) { + if (real_inode == inode) { + /* + * Detecting file change is based on i_version. On filesystems + * which do not support i_version, support was originally limited + * to an initial measurement/appraisal/audit, but was modified to + * assume the file changed. + */ + result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, + STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE, + AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT); + if (!result && (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE)) + iint->version = stat.change_cookie; + } else { iint->real_ino = real_inode->i_ino; iint->real_dev = real_inode->i_sb->s_dev; + iint->version = inode_query_iversion(real_inode);You only want to do this if IS_I_VERSION(inode) is true. If the underlying filesystem is doing its own thing wrt the i_version field, calling inode_query_iversion on it may corrupt it.quoted
quoted
}The commit that removed inode_query_iversion db1d1e8b9867 ("IMA: use vfs_getattr_nosec to get the i_version") claimed to do that because inode_query_iversion() did not work in overlayfs and now this commit uses inode_query_iversion() only for overlayfs.
Following this patch inode_query_version() would only be used when real_inode != inode, such as when a copy-up has not occurred, yet. If real_inode == inode then this is the case for the 'overlay' layer of overlayfs as well as any other non-stacked filesystem that would then still use vfs_getattr_nosec(). So is vfs_getattr_nosec() NOT the more general approach for all filesystems to use here?
quoted
STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE does not seem to make much sense in this code anymore, unless it is still needed, according to original commit to "allow IMA to work properly with a broader class of filesystems in the future."I don't have a real opinion here. When I did the original patch that switched this over to to use vfs_getattr_nosec, I didn't consider that it could end up being called from an atomic context. Reverting that
Under what conditions do we have an atomic context here? I was/am not aware of this.
seems like the correct thing to do if it's still broken. If you're fine with this only working on a subset of local filesystems, then doing something like this is probably fine: if (IS_I_VERSION(real_inode)) iint->version = inode_query_iversion(real_inode); ...but it's not clear to me what you should do if IS_I_VERSION is false. I guess IMA just falls back to checking the ctime in that case?
It does not use ctime but assumes that something has changed.