Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2024-01-10 16:14:15
Also in:
bpf, linux-mm
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2024-01-10 16:14:15
Also in:
bpf, linux-mm
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:56 AM Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:28 PM Paul Moore [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:07 AM Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Paul, Do you have any additional comments or further suggestions?No, I'm still comfortable with my original comments and stand by them.I understand your perspective, but it seems I have to propose an eBPF-based seccomp in the next step.
You likely already know this, but just in case, eBPF-based seccomp has been proposed many times in the past and has been rejected. I don't want to dissuade you from doing so again, but I suspect that this use case will not be compelling enough to be successful. -- paul-moore.com