Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 2 authors, 2024-01-10

Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2024-01-10 16:14:15
Also in: bpf, linux-mm

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:56 AM Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:28 PM Paul Moore [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:07 AM Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Paul,

Do you have any additional comments or further suggestions?
No, I'm still comfortable with my original comments and stand by them.
I understand your perspective, but it seems I have to propose an
eBPF-based seccomp in the next step.
You likely already know this, but just in case, eBPF-based seccomp has
been proposed many times in the past and has been rejected.  I don't
want to dissuade you from doing so again, but I suspect that this use
case will not be compelling enough to be successful.

-- 
paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help