Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2024-01-03

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arch/x86: Add <asm/ima-efi.h> for arch_ima_efi_boot_mode

From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Date: 2024-01-03 13:45:31
Also in: linux-arch, linux-efi, linux-integrity, linux-pci, lkml

Hi

Am 03.01.24 um 14:11 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 15:07, Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hii Ard

Am 19.12.23 um 12:38 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
quoted
Hi Thomas,

On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 13:26, Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The header file <asm/efi.h> contains the macro arch_ima_efi_boot_mode,
which expands to use struct boot_params from <asm/bootparams.h>. Many
drivers include <linux/efi.h>, but do not use boot parameters. Changes
to bootparam.h or its included headers can easily trigger large,
unnessary rebuilds of the kernel.

Moving x86's arch_ima_efi_boot_mode to <asm/ima-efi.h> and including
<asm/setup.h> separates that dependency from the rest of the EFI
interfaces. The only user is in ima_efi.c. As the file already declares
a default value for arch_ima_efi_boot_mode, move this define into
asm-generic for all other architectures.

With arch_ima_efi_boot_mode removed from efi.h, <asm/bootparam.h> can
later be removed from further x86 header files.
Apologies if I missed this in v1 but is the new asm-generic header
really necessary? Could we instead turn arch_ima_efi_boot_mode into a
function that is a static inline { return unset; } by default, but can
be emitted out of line in one of the x86/platform/efi.c source files,
where referring to boot_params is fine?
I cannot figure out how to do this without *something* in asm-generic or
adding if-CONFIG_X86 guards in ima-efi.c.

But I noticed that linux/efi.h already contains 2 or 3 ifdef branches
for x86. Would it be an option to move this code into asm/efi.h
(including a header file in asm-generic for the non-x86 variants) and
add the arch_ima_efi_boot_mode() helper there as well?  At least that
wouldn't be a header for only a single define.
Could we just move the x86 implementation out of line?

So something like this in arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h

enum efi_secureboot_mode x86_ima_efi_boot_mode(void);
#define arch_ima_efi_boot_mode x86_ima_efi_boot_mode()

and an implementation in one of the related .c files:

enum efi_secureboot_mode x86_ima_efi_boot_mode(void)
{
     return boot_params.secure_boot;
}

?
Well, that's just enough to avoid boot_params within the header file. 
But it should work.

Best regards
Thomas


-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help