Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] security: Add CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-09-21 23:03:17
Also in:
bpf
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:25 PM KP Singh [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
0xffffffff818f0e72 <+66>: mov %r14,%rdi 0xffffffff818f0e75 <+69>: mov %ebp,%esi 0xffffffff818f0e77 <+71>: mov %rbx,%rdx 0xffffffff818f0e7a <+74>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 0xffffffff818f0e7f <+79>: test %eax,%eax 0xffffffff818f0e81 <+81>: jne 0xffffffff818f0e4d <security_file_ioctl+29> 0xffffffff818f0e83 <+83>: jmp 0xffffffff818f0e49 <security_file_ioctl+25> 0xffffffff818f0e85 <+85>: endbr64 0xffffffff818f0e89 <+89>: mov %r14,%rdi 0xffffffff818f0e8c <+92>: mov %ebp,%esi 0xffffffff818f0e8e <+94>: mov %rbx,%rdx 0xffffffff818f0e91 <+97>: pop %rbx 0xffffffff818f0e92 <+98>: pop %r14 0xffffffff818f0e94 <+100>: pop %rbp 0xffffffff818f0e95 <+101>: ret Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Thanks, Song
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- security/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ security/security.c | 12 +++++++----- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig index 52c9af08ad35..bd2a0dff991a 100644 --- a/security/Kconfig +++ b/security/Kconfig@@ -32,6 +32,17 @@ config SECURITY If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N. +config SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY + bool "LSM hooks are likely to be initialized" + depends on SECURITY + default y + help + This controls the behaviour of the static keys that guard LSM hooks. + If LSM hooks are likely to be initialized by LSMs, then one gets + better performance by enabling this option. However, if the system is + using an LSM where hooks are much likely to be disabled, one gets + better performance by disabling this config. + config SECURITYFS bool "Enable the securityfs filesystem" helpdiff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index d1ee72e563cc..7ab0e044f83d 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c@@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ static __initdata struct lsm_info *exclusive; * Define static calls and static keys for each LSM hook. */ -#define DEFINE_LSM_STATIC_CALL(NUM, NAME, RET, ...) \ - DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM), \ - *((RET(*)(__VA_ARGS__))NULL)); \ +#define DEFINE_LSM_STATIC_CALL(NUM, NAME, RET, ...) \ + DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(LSM_STATIC_CALL(NAME, NUM), \ + *((RET(*)(__VA_ARGS__))NULL)); \ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(NAME, NUM)); #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \@@ -825,7 +825,8 @@ static int lsm_superblock_alloc(struct super_block *sb) */ #define __CALL_STATIC_VOID(NUM, HOOK, ...) \ do { \ - if (static_branch_unlikely(&SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \ + if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY, \ + &SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \ static_call(LSM_STATIC_CALL(HOOK, NUM))(__VA_ARGS__); \ } \ } while (0);@@ -837,7 +838,8 @@ do { \ #define __CALL_STATIC_INT(NUM, R, HOOK, LABEL, ...) \ do { \ - if (static_branch_unlikely(&SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \ + if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY, \ + &SECURITY_HOOK_ACTIVE_KEY(HOOK, NUM))) { \ R = static_call(LSM_STATIC_CALL(HOOK, NUM))(__VA_ARGS__); \ if (R != 0) \ goto LABEL; \ --2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog