Re: [PATCH v2] integrity: Always reference the blacklist keyring with apprasial
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Date: 2023-07-13 15:27:29
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Jul 12, 2023, at 3:33 PM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 21:12 +0000, Eric Snowberg wrote:quoted
quoted
On Jul 12, 2023, at 11:40 AM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 18:52 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:quoted
Commit 273df864cf746 ("ima: Check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig") introduced an appraise_flag option for referencing the blacklist keyring. Any matching binary found on this keyring fails signature validation. This flag only works with module appended signatures. An important part of a PKI infrastructure is to have the ability to do revocation at a later time should a vulnerability be found. Expand the revocation flag usage to all appraisal functions. The flag is now enabled by default. Setting the flag with an IMA policy has been deprecated. Without a revocation capability like this in place, only authenticity can be maintained. With this change, integrity can now be achieved with digital signature based IMA appraisal. Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>Thanks, Eric. Other than including "appraise_flag=check_blacklist" when displaying the measurement list, it looks good.Thanks for your review. I want to make sure I understand the request here. Do you mean you don’t want to see “appraise_flag=check_blacklist” when you cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy? Or are you referencing a change in the /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements list? Thanks.The IMA policy rules as displayed via <securityfs>/ima/policy should not contain “appraise_flag=check_blacklist".
Ok, I will fix this in v3, thanks.