Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2023-06-23

Re: [PATCH 77/79] security: switch to new ctime accessors

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2023-06-23 14:15:52
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:49 AM Jeff Layton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In later patches, we're going to change how the ctime.tv_nsec field is
utilized. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
inode->i_ctime.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 security/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
index 6c326939750d..086280390793 100644
--- a/security/inode.c
+++ b/security/inode.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static struct dentry *securityfs_create_dentry(const char *name, umode_t mode,

        inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
        inode->i_mode = mode;
-       inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
+       inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode_ctime_set_current(inode);
In the process of looking at inode_ctime_set_current() I ran into the
same bug others noticed regarding inode_set_ctime()/inode_ctime_set();
assuming that gets fixed this looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
        inode->i_private = data;
        if (S_ISDIR(mode)) {
                inode->i_op = &simple_dir_inode_operations;
--
2.41.0
-- 
paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help