Re: [PATCH 08/11] kernel: pid_namespace: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl()
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-03-10 07:01:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-patches, lkml
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-03-10 07:01:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-patches, lkml
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:14:33PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:13:54PM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:28 PM Luis Chamberlain [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
kernel/pid_sysctl.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Acked-by: Jeff Xu <redacted>Andrew, kernel/pid_sysctl.h is new, not on v6.3-rc1 and so I cannot carry this on sysctl-next. Can you carry this patch on your tree? I see Eric Biggers already took in the fs-verity patch, so I will drop that from my queue. I can take the rest in this series. I will also hold off on the last patch which deprecates the routine register_sysctl_paths() until after say the first part of the merge window. This will allow all of our trees to work on linux-next without conflict. Let me know if this is OK with you and Eric!That's fine with me. I applied the fsverity patch based on your cover letter that said it was okay (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302202826.776286-1-mcgrof@kernel.org (local)).
Yeah it perfectly fine!
If you'd like to take all the patches so that you can remove register_sysctl_paths() in the same cycle, that would be fine too; it's up to you.
Nah it's fine, no rush in this. One small step at a time. Luis