Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] certs: log hash value on blacklist error
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-11-28 01:12:06
Also in:
keyrings, linux-integrity, lkml
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-11-28 01:12:06
Also in:
keyrings, linux-integrity, lkml
"Make blacklisted hash available in klog" On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 05:03:41AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Without this information these logs are not actionable.
Without blacklisted hash?
For example on duplicate blacklisted hashes reported by the system firmware users should be able to report the erroneous hashes to their system vendors. While we are at it use the dedicated format string for ERR_PTR.
Lacks the beef so saying "while we are at it" makes no sense.
Fixes: 6364d106e041 ("certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring")Why does this count as a bug?
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> --- certs/blacklist.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c index 41f10601cc72..6e260c4b6a19 100644 --- a/certs/blacklist.c +++ b/certs/blacklist.c@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash) KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); if (IS_ERR(key)) { - pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key)); + pr_err("Problem blacklisting hash %s: %pe\n", hash, key); return PTR_ERR(key); } return 0;-- 2.38.1
BR, Jarkko