Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 6 authors, 2022-11-30

Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] lsm: Redefine LSM_HOOK() macro to add return value flags as argument

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2022-11-16 02:27:19
Also in: bpf, lkml, stable

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:58 PM Roberto Sassu
[off-list ref] wrote:
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

Define four return value flags (LSM_RET_NEG, LSM_RET_ZERO, LSM_RET_ONE,
LSM_RET_GT_ONE), one for each interval of interest (< 0, = 0, = 1, > 1).

Redefine the LSM_HOOK() macro to add return value flags as argument, and
set the correct flags for each LSM hook.

Implementors of new LSM hooks should do the same as well.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7.x
Fixes: 9d3fdea789c8 ("bpf: lsm: Provide attachment points for BPF LSM programs")
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_lsm.h       |   2 +-
 include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 779 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h     |   9 +-
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c          |   5 +-
 security/bpf/hooks.c          |   2 +-
 security/security.c           |   4 +-
 6 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 335 deletions(-)
Just a quick note here that even if we wanted to do something like
this, it is absolutely not -stable kernel material.  No way.

-- 
paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help