On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 3:58 PM Eric W. Biederman [off-list ref] wrote:

Paul Moore [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

At the end of the v4 patchset I suggested merging this into lsm/next
so it could get a full -rc cycle in linux-next, assuming no issues
were uncovered during testing

What in the world can be uncovered in linux-next for code that has no in
tree users.

The patchset provides both BPF LSM and SELinux implementations of the
hooks along with a BPF LSM test under tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.
If no one beats me to it, I plan to work on adding a test to the
selinux-testsuite as soon as I'm done dealing with other urgent
LSM/SELinux issues (io_uring CMD passthrough, SCTP problems, etc.); I
run these tests multiple times a week (multiple times a day sometimes)
against the -rcX kernels with the lsm/next, selinux/next, and
audit/next branches applied on top.  I know others do similar things.

-- 
paul-moore.com