Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 5 authors, 2022-05-19

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals

From: Arseny Maslennikov <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-07 19:30:51
Also in: ceph-devel, kvm, linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, linux-m68k, linux-nfs, linux-scsi, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:31:44PM -0800, Walt Drummond wrote:
The only standard tools that support SIGINFO are sleep, dd and ping,
(and kill, for obvious reasons) so it's not like there's a vast hole
in the tooling or something, nor is there a large legacy software base
just waiting for SIGINFO to appear.   So while I very much enjoyed
figuring out how to make SIGINFO work ...
As far as I recall, GNU make on *BSD does support SIGINFO (Not a
standard tool, but obviously an established one).

The developers of strace have expressed interest in SIGINFO support
to print tracer status messages (unfortunately, not on a public list).
Computational software can use this instead of stderr progress spam, if
run in an interactive fashion on a terminal, as it frequently is. There
is a user base, it's just not very vocal on kernel lists. :)

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help