Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2021-12-29

Re: [PATCH] tpm: Fix kexec crash due to access to ops NULL pointer (powerpc)

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-12-21 14:18:16
Also in: linux-integrity, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Subsystem: the rest, tpm device driver · Maintainers: Linus Torvalds, Peter Huewe, Jarkko Sakkinen

On 12/21/21 09:01, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 12/21/21 03:47, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:28:04PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
quoted
Fix the following crash on kexec by checking chip->ops for a NULL 
pointer
in tpm_chip_start() and returning an error code if this is the case.

BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000060
Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000099a06c
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
...
NIP [c00000000099a06c] tpm_chip_start+0x2c/0x140
  LR [c00000000099a808] tpm_chip_unregister+0x108/0x170
Call Trace:
[c0000000188bfa00] [c000000002b03930] fw_devlink_strict+0x0/0x8 
(unreliable)
[c0000000188bfa30] [c00000000099a808] tpm_chip_unregister+0x108/0x170
[c0000000188bfa70] [c0000000009a3874] tpm_ibmvtpm_remove+0x34/0x130
[c0000000188bfae0] [c000000000110dbc] vio_bus_remove+0x5c/0xb0
[c0000000188bfb20] [c0000000009bc154] device_shutdown+0x1d4/0x3a8
[c0000000188bfbc0] [c000000000196e14] kernel_restart_prepare+0x54/0x70

The referenced patch below introduced a function to shut down the 
VIO bus.
The bus shutdown now calls tpm_del_char_device (via 
tpm_chip_unregister)
after a call to tpm_class_shutdown, which already set chip->ops to 
NULL.
The crash occurrs when tpm_del_char_device calls tpm_chip_start with 
the
chip->ops NULL pointer.

Fixes: 39d0099f9439 ("powerpc/pseries: Add shutdown() to vio_driver 
and vio_bus")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
---
  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index ddaeceb7e109..cca1bde296ee 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ int tpm_chip_start(struct tpm_chip *chip)
  {
      int ret;
  +    if (!chip->ops)
+        return -EINVAL;
This triggers to all drivers, not just tpm_ibmvtpm, i.e. the fix has
side-effects.
What are those side-effects?
I am asking because if one entered tpm_chip_start() with chip->ops = 
NULL it would crash any system. So now the side-effect is that one can 
call this function without crashing the system but gets an -EINVAL back.

Another alternative that prevents these crashes is this change here 
including code deduplication:
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index ddaeceb7e109..888d37293091 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev)
         struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(dev, struct tpm_chip, dev);

         down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
-       if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
+       if (chip->ops && chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
                 if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
                         tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
                         tpm_chip_stop(chip);
@@ -473,15 +473,7 @@ static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
         mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);

         /* Make the driver uncallable. */
-       down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
-       if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
-               if (!tpm_chip_start(chip)) {
-                       tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
-                       tpm_chip_stop(chip);
-               }
-       }
-       chip->ops = NULL;
-       up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
+       tpm_class_shutdown(&chip->dev);
  }

  static void tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(struct tpm_chip *chip)



     Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help