Booting to Android userspace on 5.14 or newer triggers the following
SELinux denial:
avc: denied { sys_nice } for comm="init" capability=23
scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=u:r:init:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
Init is PID 0 running as root, so it already has CAP_SYS_ADMIN. For
better compatibility with older SEPolicy, check ADMIN before NICE.
Fixes: 9d3a39a5f1e4 ("block: grant IOPRIO_CLASS_RT to CAP_SYS_NICE")
Signed-off-by: Alistair Delva <redacted>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <redacted>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.14+
---
v2: added comment requested by Jens
block/ioprio.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/ioprio.c b/block/ioprio.c
index 0e4ff245f2bf..313c14a70bbd 100644
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ int ioprio_check_cap(int ioprio)
switch (class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ /*
+ * Originally this only checked for CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+ * which was implicitly allowed for pid 0 by security
+ * modules such as SELinux. Make sure we check
+ * CAP_SYS_ADMIN first to avoid a denial/avc for
+ * possibly missing CAP_SYS_NICE permission.
+ */
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
fallthrough;
/* rt has prio field too */--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
On 11/15/21 10:16 AM, Alistair Delva wrote:
quoted hunk
Booting to Android userspace on 5.14 or newer triggers the following
SELinux denial:
avc: denied { sys_nice } for comm="init" capability=23
scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=u:r:init:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
Init is PID 0 running as root, so it already has CAP_SYS_ADMIN. For
better compatibility with older SEPolicy, check ADMIN before NICE.
Fixes: 9d3a39a5f1e4 ("block: grant IOPRIO_CLASS_RT to CAP_SYS_NICE")
Signed-off-by: Alistair Delva <redacted>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <redacted>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.14+
---
v2: added comment requested by Jens
block/ioprio.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/ioprio.c b/block/ioprio.c
index 0e4ff245f2bf..313c14a70bbd 100644
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ int ioprio_check_cap(int ioprio)
switch (class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ /*
+ * Originally this only checked for CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+ * which was implicitly allowed for pid 0 by security
+ * modules such as SELinux. Make sure we check
+ * CAP_SYS_ADMIN first to avoid a denial/avc for
+ * possibly missing CAP_SYS_NICE permission.
+ */
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
fallthrough;
/* rt has prio field too */
Are there any other SELinux policies (Fedora?) that need to be verified?
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:16:55 +0000, Alistair Delva wrote:
Booting to Android userspace on 5.14 or newer triggers the following
SELinux denial:
avc: denied { sys_nice } for comm="init" capability=23
scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=u:r:init:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
[...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: Check ADMIN before NICE for IOPRIO_CLASS_RT
commit: 94c4b4fd25e6c3763941bdec3ad54f2204afa992
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:16:55PM +0000, Alistair Delva wrote:
Booting to Android userspace on 5.14 or newer triggers the following
SELinux denial:
avc: denied { sys_nice } for comm="init" capability=23
scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=u:r:init:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
Init is PID 0 running as root, so it already has CAP_SYS_ADMIN. For
better compatibility with older SEPolicy, check ADMIN before NICE.
Fixes: 9d3a39a5f1e4 ("block: grant IOPRIO_CLASS_RT to CAP_SYS_NICE")
Signed-off-by: Alistair Delva <redacted>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <redacted>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
This won't harm anything, so
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
but questions below.
quoted hunk
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.14+
---
v2: added comment requested by Jens
block/ioprio.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/ioprio.c b/block/ioprio.c
index 0e4ff245f2bf..313c14a70bbd 100644
--- a/block/ioprio.c
+++ b/block/ioprio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ int ioprio_check_cap(int ioprio)
switch (class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ /*
+ * Originally this only checked for CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+ * which was implicitly allowed for pid 0 by security
What do you mean, implicitly allowed for pid 0? Can you point to where
that happens?
+ * modules such as SELinux. Make sure we check
+ * CAP_SYS_ADMIN first to avoid a denial/avc for
+ * possibly missing CAP_SYS_NICE permission.
+ */
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
But whichever one comes first can cause an avc denial message. It seems
like we need a new capable() primitive which supports multiple bits,
when more than one can authorize an action, and which emits an audit
message only if all bits are missing.
fallthrough;
/* rt has prio field too */
--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog