Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH v28 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 02/25] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure. · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 03/25] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 04/25] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 05/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
Re: [PATCH v28 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2021-07-23
[PATCH v28 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 14/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 15/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
Re: [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records · kernel test robot <hidden> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-12
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-12
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-13
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-16
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-18
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-19
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-20
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-20
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-20
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-24
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-08-24
Re: [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes · Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> · 2021-08-24
[PATCH v28 23/25] Audit: Add record for multiple object LSM attributes · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22
[PATCH v28 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-07-22

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: 2021-08-19 22:41:06
Also in: selinux

On 8/18/2021 5:56 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:

On 8/18/2021 5:47 PM, Paul Moore wrote:

quoted

...
I just spent a few minutes tracing the code paths up from audit
through netlink and then through the socket layer and I'm not seeing
anything obvious where the path differs from any other syscall;
current->audit_context *should* be valid just like any other syscall.
However, I do have to ask, are you only seeing these audit records
with a current->audit_context equal to NULL during early boot?

Nope. Sorry.

It looks as if all of the NULL audit_context cases are for either
auditd or systemd. Given what the events are, this isn't especially
surprising.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help