Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-10

Re: [PATCH 1/3] IMA: add policy condition to measure duplicate critical data

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-02-08 21:36:03
Also in: dm-devel, linux-integrity, lkml, selinux

Hi Tushar,

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 16:45 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
IMA needs to support duplicate measurements of integrity
critical data to accurately determine the current state of that data
on the system.  Further, since measurement of duplicate data is not
required for all the use cases, it needs to be policy driven.

Define "allow_dup", a new IMA policy condition, for the IMA func
CRITICAL_DATA to allow duplicate buffer measurement of integrity
critical data.

Limit the ability to measure duplicate buffer data when action is
"measure" and func is CRITICAL_DATA.
Why?!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <redacted>
---
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 9b45d064a87d..b89eb768dd05 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #define IMA_FSNAME	0x0200
 #define IMA_KEYRINGS	0x0400
 #define IMA_LABEL	0x0800
+#define IMA_ALLOW_DUP	0x1000
 
 #define UNKNOWN		0
 #define MEASURE		0x0001	/* same as IMA_MEASURE */
@@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
 	char *fsname;
 	struct ima_rule_opt_list *keyrings; /* Measure keys added to these keyrings */
 	struct ima_rule_opt_list *label; /* Measure data grouped under this label */
Defining a new boolean entry shouldn't be necessary.    The other
boolean values are just stored in "flags".
 	struct ima_template_desc *template;
 };
thanks,

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help