Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label
From: Tushar Sugandhi <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-05 20:29:03
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-integrity, lkml, selinux
On 2020-12-24 6:29 a.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Tushar, On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:quoted
System administrators should be able to limit which kernel subsystems they want to measure the critical data for. To enable that, an IMA policy condition to choose specific kernel subsystems is needed. This policy condition would constrain the measurement of the critical data based on a label for the given subsystems.Restricting which kernel integrity critical data is measured is not only of interest to system administrators. Why single them out?
system administrators are usually responsible for system policies/configurations.They own modifications in the config files like ima-policy. That's why we wanted to address them to begin with. But you are correct. This is not only of interest to sysadmins. I will make the description more generic.
Limiting which critical data is measured is based on a label, making it flexible. In your use case scenario, you're grouping the label based on kernel subsystem, but is that really necessary? In the broader picture, there could be cross subsystem critical data being measured based on a single label. Please think about the broader picture and re-write the patch descirption more generically.
Makes sense. Will make the patch description more generic.
quoted
Add a new IMA policy condition - "data_source:=" to the IMA funcWhat is with "add"? You're "adding support for" or "defining" a new policy condition. Remove the single hyphen, as explained in 3/8. Please replace "data_source" with something more generic (e.g. label).
Sounds good. Would you prefer "label" or something else like "data_label"?
In the policy file the "label" looks logical and more generic than
"data_label".
measure func=CRITICAL_DATA label=selinux
For the time being, I will stick with "label", please let me know if you
prefer something else.
Thanks,
Tushar
thanks, Mimiquoted
CRITICAL_DATA to allow measurement of various kernel subsystems. This policy condition would enable the system administrators to restrict the measurement to the labels listed in "data_source:=". Limit the measurement to the labels that are specified in the IMA policy - CRITICAL_DATA+"data_source:=". If "data_sources:=" is not provided with the func CRITICAL_DATA, the data from all the supported kernel subsystems is measured. Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <redacted>