Thread (73 messages) 73 messages, 8 authors, 2021-03-13

Re: [PATCH v6 00/40] idmapped mounts

From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Date: 2021-01-27 05:46:30
Also in: linux-api, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, linux-xfs, selinux

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:19:19PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
Hey everyone,

The only major change is the updated version of hch's pach to port xfs
to support idmapped mounts. Thanks again to Christoph for doing that
work.
(Otherwise Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys were added and the tree reordered
 to decouple filesystem specific conversion from the vfs work so they
 can proceed independent.
 For a full list of major changes between versions see the end of this
 cover letter. Please also note the large xfstests testsuite in patch 42
 that has been kept as part of this series. It verifies correct vfs
 behavior with and without idmapped mounts including covering newer vfs
 features such as io_uring.
 I currently still plan to target the v5.12 merge window.)

With this patchset we make it possible to attach idmappings to mounts,
i.e. simply put different bind mounts can expose the same file or
directory with different ownership.
Shifting of ownership on a per-mount basis handles a wide range of
long standing use-cases. Here are just a few:
- Shifting of a subset of ownership-less filesystems (vfat) for use by
  multiple users, effectively allowing for DAC on such devices
  (systemd, Android, ...)
- Allow remapping uid/gid on external filesystems or paths (USB sticks,
  network filesystem, ...) to match the local system's user and groups.
  (David Howells intends to port AFS as a first candidate.)
- Shifting of a container rootfs or base image without having to mangle
  every file (runc, Docker, containerd, k8s, LXD, systemd ...)
- Sharing of data between host or privileged containers with
  unprivileged containers (runC, Docker, containerd, k8s, LXD, ...)
- Data sharing between multiple user namespaces with incompatible maps
  (LXD, k8s, ...)

There has been significant interest in this patchset as evidenced by
user commenting on previous version of this patchset. They include
containerd, ChromeOS, systemd, LXD and a range of others. There is
already a patchset up for containerd, the default Kubernetes container
runtime https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/4734
to make use of this. systemd intends to use it in their systemd-homed
implementation for portable home directories. ChromeOS wants to make use
of it to share data between the host and the Linux containers they run
on Chrome- and Pixelbooks. There's also a few talks that of people who
are going to make use of this. The most recent one was a CNCF webinar
https://www.cncf.io/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Rootless-Containers-in-Gitpod.pdf
and upcoming talk during FOSDEM.
(Fwiw, for fun and since I wanted to do this for a long time I've ported
 my home directory to be completely portable with a simple service file
 that now mounts my home directory on an ext4 formatted usb stick with
 an id mapping mapping all files to the random uid I'm assigned at
 login.)

Making it possible to share directories and mounts between users with
different uids and gids is itself quite an important use-case in
distributed systems environments. It's of course especially useful in
general for portable usb sticks, sharing data between multiple users in,
and sharing home directories between multiple users. The last example is
now elegantly expressed in systemd's homed concept for portable home
directories. As mentioned above, idmapped mounts also allow data from
the host to be shared with unprivileged containers, between privileged
and unprivileged containers simultaneously and in addition also between
unprivileged containers with different idmappings whenever they are used
to isolate one container completely from another container.

We have implemented and proposed multiple solutions to this before. This
included the introduction of fsid mappings, a tiny filesystem I've
authored with Seth Forshee that is currently carried in Ubuntu that has
shown to be the wrong approach, and the conceptual hack of calling
override creds directly in the vfs. In addition, to some of these
solutions being hacky none of these solutions have covered all of the
above use-cases.

Idmappings become a property of struct vfsmount instead of tying it to a
process being inside of a user namespace which has been the case for all
other proposed approaches. It also allows to pass down the user
namespace into the filesystems which is a clean way instead of violating
calling conventions by strapping the user namespace information that is
a property of the mount to the caller's credentials or similar hacks.
Each mount can have a separate idmapping and idmapped mounts can even be
created in the initial user namespace unblocking a range of use-cases.

To this end the vfsmount struct gains a new struct user_namespace
member. The idmapping of the user namespace becomes the idmapping of the
mount. A caller that is privileged with respect to the user namespace of
the superblock of the underlying filesystem can create an idmapped
mount. In the future, we can enable unprivileged use-cases by checking
whether the caller is privileged wrt to the user namespace that an
already idmapped mount has been marked with, allowing them to change the
idmapping. For now, keep things simple until the need arises.
Note, that with syscall interception it is already possible to intercept
idmapped mount requests from unprivileged containers and handle them in
a sufficiently privileged container manager. Support for this is already
available in LXD and will be available in runC where syscall
interception is currently in the process of becoming part of the runtime
spec: https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/pull/1074.

The user namespace the mount will be marked with can be specified by
passing a file descriptor refering to the user namespace as an argument
to the new mount_setattr() syscall together with the new
MOUNT_ATTR_IDMAP flag. By default vfsmounts are marked with the initial
user namespace and no behavioral or performance changes are observed.
All mapping operations are nops for the initial user namespace. When a
file/inode is accessed through an idmapped mount the i_uid and i_gid of
the inode will be remapped according to the user namespace the mount has
been marked with.

In order to support idmapped mounts, filesystems need to be changed and
mark themselves with the FS_ALLOW_IDMAP flag in fs_flags. The initial
version contains fat, ext4, and xfs including a list of examples.
But patches for other filesystems are actively worked on and will be
sent out separately. We are here to see this through and there are
multiple people involved in converting filesystems. So filesystem
developers are not left alone with this and are provided with a large
testsuite to verify that their port is correct.

There is a simple tool available at
https://github.com/brauner/mount-idmapped that allows to create idmapped
mounts so people can play with this patch series. Here are a few
illustrations:

1. Create a simple idmapped mount of another user's home directory

u1001@f2-vm:/$ sudo ./mount-idmapped --map-mount b:1000:1001:1 /home/ubuntu/ /mnt
u1001@f2-vm:/$ ls -al /home/ubuntu/
total 28
drwxr-xr-x 2 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 Oct 28 22:07 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root   root   4096 Oct 28 04:00 ..
-rw------- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 3154 Oct 28 22:12 .bash_history
-rw-r--r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu  220 Feb 25  2020 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 3771 Feb 25  2020 .bashrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu  807 Feb 25  2020 .profile
-rw-r--r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu    0 Oct 16 16:11 .sudo_as_admin_successful
-rw------- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 1144 Oct 28 00:43 .viminfo
So I assume this falls under the buyer beware warning, but it's
probably important to warn people loudly of the fact that, at this
point, the user with uid 1001 can chmod u+s any binary under /mnt
and then run it from /home/ubuntu with euid=1000.  In other words,
that while this has excellent uses, if you *can* use shared group
membership, you should :)

Very cool though.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help