[PATCH v7 0/8] IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
[PATCH v7 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] IMA: limit critical data measurement based on a label · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-11
Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-11
Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook · Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 6/8] IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the measurement based on a label · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the measurement based on a label · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the measurement based on a label · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure critical data · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] IMA: add policy rule to measure critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
[PATCH v7 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-09
Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data · Tyler Hicks <hidden> · 2020-12-10
Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11
Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data · Tushar Sugandhi <hidden> · 2020-12-11

Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA critical data hook

From: Tyler Hicks <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-11 16:38:09
Also in: dm-devel, linux-integrity, lkml, selinux

On 2020-12-11 09:36:30, Tyler Hicks wrote:

The calls to pr_err() in this aren't quite following the style of the
other error SELinux error messages.

Sorry, I left out a word. I meant to say that the calls to pr_err() in
this *file* aren't quite following the right style. Please adjust all of
them.

Thanks!

Tyler

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help