Hello,
On 17/11/2020 09:30, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Nack.
This API is meant to take simple integers, so that programmers can use
atomic64_t with it and have safe nonces. I'm also interested in
preserving the API's ability to safely encrypt more than 4 gigs of
data at once. Passing a buffer also encourages people to use
randomized nonces, which isn't really safe. Finally, there are no
in-tree users of 96bit nonces for this interface. If you're after a
cornucopia of compatibility primitives, the ipsec stuff might be more
to your fitting. Or, add a new simple function/api. But adding
complexity to users of the existing one and confusing future users of
it is a non-starter. It's supposed to be deliberately non-awful to
use.
Thanks for explaining the ratio behind this API.
At first I thought this API wanted to take over the existing one, hence
my attempt of making it more generic and re-use it.
But I understand now this was not the goal.
I will stick to the classic crypto API then.
Best Regards,
p.s. I am curious about any use case you may have in mind for encrypting
more than 4GB in one go, as there are no users doing that right now.
--
Antonio Quartulli