[PATCH v3 11/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised

From
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Date
2020-11-11 09:26:45
Also in
linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, lkml
Reply to
Roberto Sassu, 2020-11-11
Files might come from a remote source and might have xattrs, including
security.ima. It should not be IMA task to decide whether security.ima
should be kept or not. This patch removes the removexattr() system
call in ima_inode_post_setattr().

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 00b038941a10..f03cb4b7270d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -529,8 +529,6 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry)
 		return;
 
 	action = ima_must_appraise(inode, MAY_ACCESS, POST_SETATTR);
-	if (!action)
-		__vfs_removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA);
 	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
 	if (iint) {
 		set_bit(IMA_CHANGE_ATTR, &iint->atomic_flags);
-- 
2.27.GIT
Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2021-03-01
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help