Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 2 authors, 2020-10-27

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs

From: Tushar Sugandhi <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-23 22:38:17
Also in: dm-devel, linux-integrity, lkml, selinux

Thanks Mimi for your overall feedback on this series.
Really appreciate it.

On 2020-10-22 12:39 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Tushar,

On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 12:20 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index fe1df373c113..31a772d8a86b 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -451,15 +451,19 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
  }
  
  /**
- * ima_match_keyring - determine whether the keyring matches the measure rule
- * @rule: a pointer to a rule
- * @keyring: name of the keyring to match against the measure rule
+ * ima_match_rule_data - determine whether the given func_data matches
+ *			 the measure rule data
+ * @rule: IMA policy rule
+ * @opt_list: rule data to match func_data against
+ * @func_data: data to match against the measure rule data
   * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation
   *
- * Returns true if keyring matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
+ * Returns true if func_data matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
   */
-static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
-			      const char *keyring, const struct cred *cred)
+static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
+				const struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list,
+				const char *func_data,
+				const struct cred *cred)
  {
  	bool matched = false;
  	size_t i;
@@ -467,14 +471,14 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
  	if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !rule->uid_op(cred->uid, rule->uid))
  		return false;
  
-	if (!rule->keyrings)
+	if (!opt_list)
  		return true;
The opt_list should be based on rule->func.  There shouldn't be a need
to pass it as a variable.

Mimi
Makes sense. Will do. Thanks Mimi.
~Tushar
quoted
  
-	if (!keyring)
+	if (!func_data)
  		return false;
  
-	for (i = 0; i < rule->keyrings->count; i++) {
-		if (!strcmp(rule->keyrings->items[i], keyring)) {
+	for (i = 0; i < opt_list->count; i++) {
+		if (!strcmp(opt_list->items[i], func_data)) {
  			matched = true;
  			break;
  		}
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help