Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2020-10-25

RE: [RFC PATCH 00/30] ima: Introduce IMA namespace

From: Krzysztof Struczynski <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-19 09:30:33
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

From: Krzysztof Struczynski
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 2:08 PM
quoted
When Roberto Sassu and Krzysztof Struczynski contacted me about the
status of Stefan Berger's patch set, based on Yuqiong Sun's work, I was
under the impression that they would be rebasing it on the latest
kernel and going forward from there.   Obviously things changed.  I
pointed out to them resolving the "IMA namespacing" issue would be the
first thing that needs to be addressed.  So here we are.
The concept of the IMA namespace as a separate namespace, not attached to
the user or mount namespace, remains the same as in the last set of
Stefan's patches. The creation and configuration mechanism changed,
partially because of the changes in the upstream kernel like extension of
the CLONE_ flags, that facilitated other solutions. The main inspiration
in this regard was the new time namespace.

The implemented mechanism is intended to make the configuration of the
IMA
namespace as similar as possible to the upstream IMA implementation and
allows to configure the new IMA namespace before any process enters that
namespace, so the very first actions can be measured/appraised/audited.

In this implementation many design points formulated by Stefan still stand.
The significant difference in the presented design is the threat model.
The actions of the host's root and any other user within the container are
measured/appraised/audited according to the container's policy. However,
every action that affects objects in the root namespace, is detected when
processes from the root namespace access them.
Do you think that the above proposal addresses the aforementioned "IMA
namespacing" issue? If it doesn't, would you please clarify what are the
main, outstanding problems?
 
quoted
Definitely, let's have this discussion.
Shall we continue the discussion here, or in addition use a format similar
to the Stefan's "drawing board":
https://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/IMA_Namespacing_design_considerations

Best regards,
Krzysztof Struczynski
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help