Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2020-10-18 19:06:58
Also in:
alsa-devel, amd-gfx, bpf, dri-devel, intel-wired-lan, keyrings, linux-acpi, linux-amlogic, linux-block, linux-can, linux-crypto, linux-edac, linux-gpio, linux-iio, linux-integrity, linux-media, linux-pci, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, linux-scsi, linux-serial, linux-usb, linux-watchdog, linux-wireless, lkml, netdev, nouveau, nvdimm, ocfs2-devel, platform-driver-x86, virtualization, xen-devel
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 19:59 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote:quoted
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Krxz78O3RKcB9JBMVo_F98FupVhj_jxX60ddN6tKGEbv_cnooXc1nnBmchm-e_O9ieGnyQ$Please get your IT department to remove that stupidity. If you can't, please send email from a non-Red Hat email address.
I didn't get it this way, neither did lore. It's on your end. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201017160928.12698-1-trix@redhat.com/ (local)
I don't understand why this is a useful warning to fix.
Precision in coding style intent and code minimization would be the biggest factors IMO.
What actual problem is caused by the code below?
Obviously none.