Re: [PATCH v20 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock
From: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-09-04 14:08:19
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, lkml
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:39 PM Stephen Smalley [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:17 AM Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 12/08/2020 21:16, Stephen Smalley wrote:quoted
On 8/2/20 5:58 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:quoted
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Move management of the superblock->sb_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <redacted> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829232935.7099-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com (local) --- Changes since v17: * Rebase the original LSM stacking patch from v5.3 to v5.7: I fixed some diff conflicts caused by code moves and function renames in selinux/include/objsec.h and selinux/hooks.c . I checked that it builds but I didn't test the changes for SELinux nor SMACK.You shouldn't retain Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by lines from an earlier patch if you made non-trivial changes to it (even more so if you didn't test them).I think I made trivial changes according to the original patch. But without reply from other people with Signed-off-by or Reviewed-by (Casey, Kees, John), I'll remove them. I guess you don't want your Reviewed-by to be kept, so I'll remove it, except if you want to review this patch (or the modified part).At the very least your Reviewed-by line is wrong - yours should be Signed-off-by because the patch went through you and you modified it. I'll try to take a look as time permits but FYI you should this address (already updated in MAINTAINERS) going forward.
I finally got around to reviewing your updated patch. You can drop the old line and add: Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>