Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] IMA: Handle early boot data measurement
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-30 18:02:55
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml, selinux
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-30 18:02:55
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml, selinux
On 7/29/20 8:47 PM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: Hi Tyler,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index 080c53545ff0..86cba844f73c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig@@ -322,10 +322,9 @@ config IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS depends on ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE=y default y -config IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS +config IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_DATA bool - depends on IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS - depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING + depends on SECURITY || (IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) default y
Similar to the change you'd suggested for validating LSM_STATE and
LSM_POLICY func, I think IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_DATA config should be
enabled for SECURITY_SELINUX.
depends on SECURITY_SELINUX ||
(IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING)
And, when more security modules are added update this CONFIG as appropriate.
Does that sound okay?
-lakshmi