Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] LSM: Define SELinux function to measure security state
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-20 18:27:20
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml, selinux
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-20 18:27:20
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml, selinux
On 7/20/20 10:49 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
quoted
quoted
Looks like the template used is ima-ng which doesn't include the measured buffer. Please set template to "ima-buf" in the policy. For example, measure func=LSM_STATE template=ima-bufIt seems like one shouldn't need to manually specify it if it is the only template that yields a useful result for the LSM_STATE function?Actually, if we used ima-ng template for selinux-policy-hash, then instead of needing to hash the policy first and passing the hash to IMA, we could just pass the policy as the buffer and IMA would take care of the hashing, right?
That is correct. The IMA hook I've added to measure LSM structures is a generic one that can be used by any security module (SM). I feel it would be better to not have policy or state or any such SM specific logic in IMA, but leave that to the individual SM to handle. What do you think?
And we only need to use ima-buf for the selinux-state if we want the measurement list to include the string value that was hashed; if we just want to compare against a known-good, it would suffice to use ima-ng for it as well, right?
-lakshmi