Re: [PATCH v3] acpi: Extend TPM2 ACPI table with missing log fields
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 01:01:49
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-integrity, lkml
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 03:56:53AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:14:20AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:quoted
On 4/2/20 3:21 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:quoted
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:05:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:37 AM Jarkko Sakkinen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:49:49PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:quoted
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> Recent extensions of the TPM2 ACPI table added 3 more fields including 12 bytes of start method specific parameters and Log Area Minimum Length (u32) and Log Area Start Address (u64). So, we extend the existing structure with these fields to allow non-UEFI systems to access the TPM2's log. The specification that has the new fields is the following: TCG ACPI Specification Family "1.2" and "2.0" Version 1.2, Revision 8 Adapt all existing table size calculations to use offsetof(struct acpi_table_tpm2, start_method_specific) [where start_method_specific is a newly added field] rather than sizeof(struct acpi_table_tpm2) so that the addition of the new fields does not affect current systems that may not have them. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.orgI think I'm cool with this but needs an ack from ACPI maintainer. Rafael, given that this not an intrusive change in any possible means, can I pick this patch and put it to my next pull request?Yes, please. Thanks!Great, thanks Rafael. Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <redacted> Do you mind if I add your ack to the commit?Any chance to get v4 applied?You should split the actbl3.h change to a separate patch and add 'Cc:' tag to Rafael to the commit message.
Send v5 with Rafael's ack (no need to split anymore). /Jarkko