Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2020-06-30

Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] umh: Separate the user mode driver and the user mode helper support

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2020-06-30 16:59:10
Also in: bpf, linux-fsdevel, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:05 PM Eric W. Biederman [off-list ref] wrote:
This makes it clear which code is part of the core user mode
helper support and which code is needed to implement user mode
drivers.

 kernel/umd.c             | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/umh.c             | 139 -------------------------------------
I certainly don't object to the split, but I hate the name.

We have uml, umd and umh for user mode {linux, drivers, helper}
respectively.And honestly, I don't see the point in using an obscure
and unreadable TLA for something like this.

I really don't think it would hurt to write out even the full name
with "usermode_driver.c" or something like that, would it?

Then "umd" could be continued to be used as a prefix for the helper
functions, by all means, but if we startv renaming files, can we do it
properly?

                   Linus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help