Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] capabilities: Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
From: Andrei Vagin <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-10 07:59:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, selinux
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:06:27AM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:42:21PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP is needed for C/R and it is protected by CAP_SYS_ADMIN too.This is currently capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (init_ns capable) why is it safe to allow unprivileged users to suspend security policies? That sounds like a bad idea.
...
quoted
I don't suggest to remove or downgrade this capability check. The patch allows all c/r related operations if the current has CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. So in this case the check: if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EPERM; will be converted in: if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE)) return -EPERM;Yeah, I got that but what's the goal here? Isn't it that you want to make it safe to install the criu binary with the CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE fscap set so that unprivileged users can restore their own processes without creating a new user namespace or am I missing something? The use-cases in the cover-letter make it sound like that's what this is leading up to:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
* Checkpoint/Restore in an HPC environment in combination with a resource manager distributing jobs where users are always running as non-root. There is a desire to provide a way to checkpoint and restore long running jobs. * Container migration as non-root * We have been in contact with JVM developers who are integrating CRIU into a Java VM to decrease the startup time. These checkpoint/restore applications are not meant to be running with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.But maybe I'm just misunderstanding crucial bits (likely (TM)).
I think you understand this right. The goal is to make it possible to use C/R functionality for unprivileged processes. And for me, here are two separate tasks. The first one is how to allow unprivileged users to use C/R from the root user namespace. This is what we discuss here. And another one is how to allow to use C/R functionality from a non-root user namespaces. The second task is about downgrading capable to ns_capable for map_files and PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP. Thanks, Andrei