Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 6 authors, 2020-06-10

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] capabilities: Introduce CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE

From: Andrei Vagin <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-10 07:59:37
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml, selinux

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:06:27AM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:42:21PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP is needed for C/R and it is protected by
CAP_SYS_ADMIN too.
This is currently capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (init_ns capable) why is it
safe to allow unprivileged users to suspend security policies? That
sounds like a bad idea.
...
quoted
I don't suggest to remove or
downgrade this capability check. The patch allows all c/r related
operations if the current has CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE.

So in this case the check:
     if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
             return -EPERM;

will be converted in:
     if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE))
             return -EPERM;
Yeah, I got that but what's the goal here? Isn't it that you want to
make it safe to install the criu binary with the CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
fscap set so that unprivileged users can restore their own processes
without creating a new user namespace or am I missing something? The
use-cases in the cover-letter make it sound like that's what this is
leading up to:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
* Checkpoint/Restore in an HPC environment in combination with a resource
  manager distributing jobs where users are always running as non-root.
  There is a desire to provide a way to checkpoint and restore long running
  jobs.
* Container migration as non-root
* We have been in contact with JVM developers who are integrating
  CRIU into a Java VM to decrease the startup time. These checkpoint/restore
  applications are not meant to be running with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
But maybe I'm just misunderstanding crucial bits (likely (TM)).
I think you understand this right. The goal is to make it possible to
use C/R functionality for unprivileged processes. And for me, here are
two separate tasks. The first one is how to allow unprivileged users to
use C/R from the root user namespace. This is what we discuss here.

And another one is how to allow to use C/R functionality from a non-root
user namespaces. The second task is about downgrading capable to
ns_capable for map_files and PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP.

Thanks,
Andrei
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help